Inside the Bush White House and Washington's Culture of Deception

White House Puzzled About Ex-Aide's Scathing Book


In this April 19, 2006 file photo, President Bush, right, walks with White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan, right, at the White House in Washington, after McClellan announced that he is stepping down as White House press secretary. Ron Edmonds

From Associated Press
May 28, 2008 5:19 PM EDT

WASHINGTON - Former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan writes in a new memoir that President Bush relied on an aggressive "political propaganda campaign" instead of the truth to sell the Iraq war, and that the decision to invade pushed Bush's presidency "terribly off course.'

The Bush White House made "a decision to turn away from candor and honesty when those qualities were most needed" - a time when the nation was on the brink of war, McClellan writes in the book entitled "What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington's Culture of Deception."

The way Bush managed the Iraq issue "almost guaranteed that the use of force would become the only feasible option."

"In the permanent campaign era, it was all about manipulating sources of public opinion to the president's advantage," McClellan writes.

White House aides seemed stunned by the scathing tone of the book, and Bush press secretary Dana Perino issued a statement that was highly critical of their former colleague.

"Scott, we now know, is disgruntled about his experience at the White House," she said. "For those of us who fully supported him, before, during and after he was press secretary, we are puzzled. It is sad - this is not the Scott we knew."

Perino said the reports on the book had been described to Bush, and that she did not expect him to comment. "He has more pressing matters than to spend time commenting on books by former staffers," she said.

The book provoked strong reactions from former staffers as well.

"For him to do this now strikes me as self-serving, disingenuous and unprofessional," Fran Townsend, former head of the White House-based counterterrorism office, told CNN.

Said former top aide Karl Rove, in an interview with Fox News Channel, "If he had these moral qualms, he should have spoken up about them. And frankly I don't remember him speaking up about these things. I don't remember a single word."

Richard Clarke, another former counterterrorism adviser who also came out with a book critical of administration policy, said he could understand McClellan's thinking, however. Clarke told CNN that he, too, was harshly criticized, saying that "I can show you the tire tracks."

McClellan called the Iraq war a "serious strategic blunder," a surprisingly harsh assessment from the man who was at that time the loyal public voice of the White House who had followed Bush to Washington from Texas.

"The Iraq war was not necessary," he concludes. "Waging an unnecessary war is a grave mistake."

McClellan admits that some of his own words from the podium in the White House briefing room turned out to be "badly misguided." But he says he was sincere at the time.

"When words I uttered, believing them to be true, were exposed as false, I was constrained by my duties and loyalty to the president and unable to comment," he said. "But I promised reporters and the public that I would someday tell the whole story of what I knew."

The former press secretary - the second of four so far in Bush's presidency - explained his dramatic shift from loyal defender to fierce critic as a difficult act of personal contrition, a way, he wrote, to learn from his mistakes, be true to his Christian faith and become a better person.

"I fell far short of living up to the kind of public servant I wanted to be," McClellan writes. He also blames the media whose questions he fielded, calling them "complicit enablers" in the White House campaign to manipulate public opinion toward the need for war.

McClellan said Bush loyalists will no doubt continue to think the administration's decisions have been correct and its unpopularity undeserved. "I've become genuinely convinced otherwise," he said.

The book is scheduled to go on sale June 1. Quotes from the book were first reported Tuesday night by the Web site Politico, which said it found McClellan's memoir on sale early at a bookstore.

McClellan draws a portrait of Bush as possessing "personal charm, wit and enormous political skill." He said Bush's record as Texas governor and "disarming personality" inspired him to follow him and that his administration early on possessed "seeds of greatness."

But, McClellan said, Bush's unwillingness to admit mistakes and belief in his own spin contributed to turning the president into "not quite the leader I once imagined him to be." He faults Bush for a "lack of inquisitiveness" and "a degree of self-deception that may be psychologically necessary to justify the tactics needed to win the political game."

Bush "convinces himself to believe what suits his needs at the moment," McClellan writes.

More On Max

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Max Hardcore Porn Trial Gets Under Way Today

You may not know this but most people who work in porn are totally nice and even kinda normal. Max is not one of us, his style is way out there. Not that I am throwing him under the bus, I knew him a long time ago liked him a lot then -- when he was not in character, that is. He claims that Max Hardcore is a character he plays to a willing audience who is of age and knows what they are getting when they get a Max movie. And we do have Free Speech in this country, I think...

From tbo.com:

With a security officer posted outside to check the identification of anyone who looked underage and a pounding soundtrack blaring through the sound system, a federal jury watched five graphic video montages this morning in the obscenity trial of a man who calls himself Max Hardcore.

"It's hard to believe that these innocent-looking girls will subject themselves to such vile perversions," boasts the Max Hardcore Web site, which depicts the defendant, whose real name is Paul Little, smiling broadly from beneath a white cowboy hat.

Little and his company, MaxWorld Entertainment, face five counts each of distributing obscene materials over the Internet and through the mail.

The prosecution, through witness James Fottress, a Justice Department investigator, played about 15 minutes of trailers this morning in which women are shown having numerous sex acts performed on them, including repeated acts with fists and various substances being sprayed on their faces and into various parts of their bodies. One trailer ends with the words, "Acting Lessons (Where Whores Play the Part of Toilets)."

Federal prosecutor Lisa Maria Freitas told jurors in her brief opening statement that the government was not seeking to attack the entire adult-entertainment industry. "We're here to present evidence, in the defendant's words, of extreme acts," she said.

Defense attorney H. Louis Sirkin, who represents MaxWorld, told jurors the videos in question were made using consenting adult actors and distributed by a company called Jaded Video, in which Little doesn't have an interest. The owner of the distribution company, Sirkin said, was given immunity and is expected to testify for the prosecution.

Attorneys for Little waived their opening statement until they begin presenting their case later in the trial.

Jurors are expected to begin viewing hours of graphic videos this afternoon.

Jurors will have to determine whether the videos violate obscenity standards of the Tampa area community.


From ABC News:

The question of what Tampa Bay area residents consider obscene is being argued before a Federal jury this week.

The jury must decide whether a producer’s pornographic films are acceptable – or unacceptable - to Bay area residents.

Paul F. Little is charged with five counts of using an online computer to sell obscene material and five counts of delivering it through the U.S. mail.

As part of their case, prosecutors plan to show jurors some 2 ½ hours of segments produced by Little, also known as Max Hardcore, and his company, Maxworld Entertainment Inc. of Altadena, California. Little, also known as Max Hardcore, has directed or acted in more than 100 movies.

Little’s lawyers say 2 ½ hours is not enough. They argue that in order for jurors to decide whether the films are obscene, they must see entire movies. This means they could be subjected to more than 8 hours of material produced by Little’s production company.

Little is on trial in Tampa because prosecutors purchased the material via his Website and had the videos sent to a Tampa Post Office box.

While not illegal, adult pornography can be prosecuted under what’s known as the Miller test, the result of a U.S. Supreme Court case from the early 1970’s.

Federal Judge Susan Bucklew has already dismissed several jurors who said they could not stomach seeing the movie clips that may include scenes involving men humiliating women, as well as vomiting, urination, and defecation.

If the jury rules in favor of the government, the films named in the indictment, profits from distribution, property used in production, Little’s home, and his Internet domain names would be forfeited.